To: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, EPA Office of Air and Radiation



Protect Americans from radioactive pollutants by releasing visible dye-markers with emergency radioactive plume releases, by issuing public health alerts for routine and accidental radiation releases, and by providing real-time radiation monitoring online – covering the 50 mile radius danger zones around commercial U.S. nuclear plants where one in three Americans live.

Why is this important?

Radiation is odorless and invisible, undetectable by human senses. Sadly, Fukushima school children were sent into the path of a radioactive plume, rather than away from it; and it took a Texas school explosion killing nearly 300 students before the law required odors in gas. We want to ensure a plume path can be spotted before an emergency occurs. Like odor-markers for natural gas, we ask that visible dyes be dispersed along with emergency radiation releases, providing immediate, direct warning of the direction radioactive plumes are traveling – a critical life-saver for first-responders and the public.

We also request that Public Health Alerts be posted online when known radioactive carcinogens and mutagens are released into our biosphere. We have weather alerts, smog alerts, and even pollen alerts, why not radiation alerts? Unfortunately, it has been "out of sight, out of mind." People deserve to know when they are being exposed to these highly toxic elements, not a year later, but when they are actually exposed – so they can protect themselves and their children.

Currently neither EPA nor NRC require comprehensive, radiological monitoring and real-time online reporting of on-site releases. The NRC relies on the nuclear plant operators to self-report radioactive releases based on quarterly averages – only once a year. Simply the fox watching the hen house.

We call on the NRC and EPA to upgrade radiation monitoring systems throughout the nation, both on reactor sites and in reactor communities (50 mile radius), with real-time online data about radioactive levels around nuclear facilities. Following the Fukushima explosions in 2011, less than 100 EPA monitors recorded radiation levels as the plumes traveled across the U.S. Since then, hundreds of citizen volunteers across the country have begun providing real-time radiation monitoring online.

The governmental agencies charged with protecting public health and safety, by enforcing safety standards and radiation levels, have a responsibility to conduct transparent monitoring to ensure safe levels are not exceeded. Currently the United States lacks comprehensive radiation monitoring and the NRC only requires annual operator reports, leaving the underfunded Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to monitor the rest of the country in real-time. An interagency effort is needed to 'connect the dots' and ensure public oversight.

We call on the NRC and EPA to coordinate and upgrade radiation monitoring systems for compatibility and transparency. The technology is well developed, both for monitoring and for reporting real-time radionuclide data online. The benefits of national radiation monitoring far outweigh the relatively small costs. Without comprehensive monitoring, government regulators cannot, and do not, adequately protect public health or protect our air, food and water from nuclear toxins that bio-accumulate and remain dangerous for generations to come.

Again, we petitioners request the following:

Dispersal of visible dyes with emergency radiation releases, providing immediate, direct warning of radioactive plume paths.

Public health alerts for routine, unplanned, and emergency radiation releases into the public biosphere from power plants, mining, incineration, accidental releases, leaks, or spills.

Real-time radiation monitoring, to coordinate and transparently report multiple-agency radioactive emissions data to the public, with nuclear operators posting real-time on-site monitoring data to the interagency monitoring website and upgrading area dosimeters to real-time radionuclide monitors.

How it will be delivered

We plan to deliver the petition in person (where appointments are possible), and via electronic mail. Visit for updates.

Reasons for signing

  • I signed because I was hit by a plume unknowingly in October 2012. I am still sick and have nose bleeds. If the radiation had been visible I may have been able to protect myself. I think all invisible death threatening elements should be visible. I also think protective clothing should be incorporated into the clothes we wear. We have to be smart and awake. People have to see it or they won't believe it's there
  • I signed because people are more important than property values. Fukushima radiation is here on the west coast in the air, the water and our food and the US government just keeps raising the acceptable levels of radiation without telling us how much we are being exposed to so we could take steps to limit the exposure, especially in our food.
  • I like the analogy w/ odor markers for natural gas - we need to know when something life threatening is afoot! Thank you!


2014-04-18 15:39:55 -0700

500 signatures reached

2014-03-05 15:21:18 -0800

100 signatures reached

2014-03-05 07:57:17 -0800

50 signatures reached

2014-03-04 17:35:54 -0800

25 signatures reached

2014-03-04 14:16:34 -0800

10 signatures reached